show all
Thursday, September 2, 2010 | 23:01 Beirut Subscribe to NOW Lebanon RSS feeds
   
The bad loser
NOW Staff , June 12, 2009
Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun leaves a polling station after casting his vote in Haret Hreik, a southern suburb of Beirut, on June 7, 2009. (AFP/STR)

Lebanese democracy is not yet the finished article, even if Interior Minister Ziad Baroud, who showed what can happen when a capable technocrat is given a chance to shine, pulled off a stunning display of public administration. If the Lebanese are to move forward into full democratic maturity, genuine leaders must step forward and they must offer solutions to issues, not play on fear or religious identity. There are 128 precious seats in parliament and if we are to be honest, our best and brightest are, with a few exceptions, still not lining up to stake a claim to shaping the future.
 
Meanwhile, those who did not perform as well at the polls as they would have liked – for it seems no one actually “loses” in these elections – must get out of the habit of throwing out excuses to muddy the political waters ahead of the formation of a new government.
 
On Monday night, no doubt in a bid to console his obedient electorate, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah argued that there was a “popular” majority as well as a parliamentary majority, implying that their sheer numbers gave Lebanon’s Shia an automatic mandate. His logic: the Shia have the majority and Hezbollah have the Shia, ergo they cannot be ignored. Such number crunching is dangerous, especially in these times of religious volatility. Lebanon is too modern a country, its make-up too diverse, its people too worldly and too educated to fall into such a primitive mindset.
 
But at least Nasrallah had the grace to concede a “parliamentary” defeat and not throw his toys out of his pram. The same cannot be said for his political ally, Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun, who has been trying his best to convince us that, despite claiming to have been robbed in the Metn – he cited “corruption,” “kidnapping,” and “money” as three reasons for not getting the magic 30 seats he wanted – he too had secured a “popular majority.” He also says that his party has 4,000 complaints about violations of the electoral law and the Media and Publications Law. So there!
 
The truth of the matter is that Aoun, paradoxically, has as much power today as he ever had, despite an obvious shift in Christian attitudes to him. His posturing has more to do with securing a presence in the next government – he wants seven out of the 30 ministerial portfolios allocated to the FPM – than any outrage over alleged illegalities. As one analyst put it, these were hardly “Swedish elections.” The FPM played the game like everyone else, including jetting-in voters from overseas.
 
And so Aoun, while moaning that he can’t understand why so many people voted for March 14, a bloc he claims is corrupt and unfocussed, with no apparent blueprint for reform, hammers away with a conspiracy theory involving Palestinian weapons in the camp, naturalization,  “moving” voters into key areas and March 14’s use of the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons a diversionary tactic. “Their only aim is to approve naturalization, and for that reason, they are directing the Lebanese’s attention away from the issue through emphasizing Hezbollah’s weapons and the threats against the Lebanese entity,” he said.
 
The simple answer is that the majority of Lebanese voted against him and his allies because they can see that the weapons in the Palestinian camps, while a long-entrenched thorn in Lebanon’s side, do not threaten to derail a democratic process so-assuredly ignited on Sunday, nor for that matter are they part of a regional master plan with potentially apocalyptic consequences.
 
Privately, Aoun knows the difference, but he is determined to drive a wedge into the country to achieve his own political ends. So far he has failed, succeeding only in hijacking the dreams and aspirations of his followers, the majority of whom are decent, law abiding Lebanese seeking an alternative voice.
 
And this is also why Aoun didn’t, and now surely never will, receive an overwhelming vote of confidence from the nation. Time will tell, but it is also why we should ultimately be more wary of the thoughtful and measured Hassan Nasrallah than the raving general.

Bookmark this article:
Digg  Facebook Google StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Delicious
Comments ( 7 )
Posted by
sami
June 27. 2009
Fred,the lebanese parliamentarian seats and other key positions are "divided" among the Lebanese "sects" according to the "size" of the sect as reprted in the 1932 census.The Maroonis were the "largest" sect then but things and numbers have changed since then and according to the UN statistics and according to the CIA even it is agreed that the Shiaa are the largest "sect" in Lebanon these days and will be the largest till they are sent to Iran or even to Syria as some are demanding.Fred ,when the electoral law changes and becomes one man one vote,one woman one vote regardless of sectarian affiliation then and only then we can have a true democracy similar to that of your allies the US,but not similar to your other allies the Saudis,the Jordanians or the Egyptians.
Posted by
sami
June 22. 2009
Kuwwat MP's are:Stereda,Kayrooz,Adwan,Zahra and Habeeb.Giorgio, anyone else you can add?The General commands the LARGEST Christian block in Lebanon(count again).27 mp's qualifies him for the presidency.
Posted by
giorgio
June 19. 2009
-first I am going to answer to Sami, try to count before to speak, you cpl have 19 deputies not 21, I will leave you the honor to count them. and concerning the LEBANESE FORCES again recount the deputies before -Now to Ali, so Ali now you are talking about majority of the Lebanese people, and we have to be grateful to hezhollah (you are saying the Shia witch is not the case)) that they are asking only for a fair representation, just for the memory Ali it's your hezbollah and the CPL ho ask for the 1960 election law in Doha!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is what aoun was continuously saying before the election DAY and he was proud of it. believing that the opposition will Win the elections. the secretary general of hezbollah use to say, always before the elections, that if the opposition Win the elections and the 14 of March would not participate to the future government they will not be any problem for him.
Posted by
Fred
June 16. 2009
Ali, the Shia do not have the majority in Lebanon. Majority= more than 50% of eligible voters. You are thinking of plurality, which means the greatest percentage. Personally, I do not think a mere 30% of the population should run the government, just because they are the largest religious group. The majority of the Lebanese probably voted for M14. Only way to prove that would be to combine all the votes from every district and see who has more than 50%. People have just got to accept the election results. And Ali, M14 will not be happy with giving M8 veto power because how will they run the governement? The people voted for March 14, and politicians have to learn to accept the people's will for M14 to adapt there policies. Giving veto power would not allow them to do so. Our country will just stay in a political deadlock with no progress or growth.
Posted by
Marco Antonio
June 13. 2009
The opposition lost the elections and the sane ones among them have admitted that. Waste all the time you want crunching all the election the numbers you want for as long as you want, it won’t change the results. Now is the time to get going with a new government and a new parliament to start the repair work necessary after years of crippling action by the opposition. Last time the opposition called the majority an “imaginary” one, this time it is here for four years. Do you want to know the definition of a sore loser? See a clip of you-tube talk show of Ghada Eid with ibrahim kin3an on New TV. Ghada is getting threats to her life and well-being and hasn’t stayed at home thanks to kin32n’s thugs. You will quickly realize who we are dealing with when it comes to the so called opposition and what would have happened to our freedoms if they would have won the elections.
Posted by
Ali
June 13. 2009
From Merriam-Webster; "Democracy: 1 a: government by the people ; especially : rule of the majority." Such number crunching is not dangerous, it is a reality. Before they yell "hoorah for Democracy" maybe people should consider the prefixed system that does not allow the people to be truly represented. It's unfair that only the loser should be in favour of universal suffrage. Call a spade a spade, if the system is biased to one side and you know it, you should not be making false claims like, "The majority of Lebanese people voted for March 14." I think the fact that the shia are willing to live under such a system is testimony to their patience or an indictment on their lack of courage to demand fair representation. Lebanon should be glad that the only thing Hezbollah is demanding is Veto power. Let's be fair, if we truly wanted democracy, shouldn't the majority of Lebanese people decide who rules?
Posted by
sami
June 12. 2009
Free patriotic movement was 16 MP's in 2005 now they are 21.They command a 27 MP block along with his allies 5 more than the last election.His block is the largest Christian block ever.Kuwwat block was 6 now it is 5 MPs.Numbers talk louder more than misinformation.
username or email
password